[ورده بغداد]

Why do the Americans liberat Iraqis and occupy Iraq?


All those who follow up with what is happening in Iraq can get to one conclusion: America in Iraq, is not the same America that people in ME used to know..
The one we had experienced, was America/CIA and conspiracy, encouraging and help killing and oppressing people. We had noticed that during Iraq/Iran war, during the Iraqi uprise post Kuwait war, in Lebanon during the Israeli occupation, anti Palestinian policy. It's support for all those Tyrants in Jordan, Egypt, Suadee, Turkey, Iraq, Israel. . That is America that we use to..
No more worse that what to be..
So what happened to America? In Iraq , America stands up a lone against all the world powers trying their best not to liberate Iraqis. Muslims/christians/jews, communists/Salafees, Arabs/non Arabs. America never gave up, insisting on liberating Iraqis, scarifying all wealth and blood.
I am not the one to buy that a huge country politics might steered by good causes, at the end there is the international interests that should rule. I also don't believe that the search of weapon of mass destruction is a possible cause. My proof is very simple, if the Americans had any doubts that Sadamm had really acquired some, then the first thing to do, should be the protection of all sites and personals that might hide this in. Something never had happened and worse than that they encouraged the chaos and let the looting of all the possible organizations even the atomic reactor in Salman Bak. Without fearing the radiation danger on their on soldiers. Not mentioning the anthrax or germs or any other biochemical substances. Even the control over the so called "Iraqi scientists”, they let them escape the country with absolutely no control. All what we hear about following up on some, I think, no more than to embroil the neighbors with them.
Then what is the interest?
Stealing Iraqi wealth? >>>> Nonsense! What American are spending, is much more than what a tiny economy of Iraq can subsidize. Even after recovery. One large scale American corporate had income that might exceed the annual income of half of ME countries. If they are really looking for such, then they should make the last 17 billion dollar as loan rather than grant. At least to engage the Iraqi economy from now as they did with Egypt or Turkey.
Oil? >>>> Was it boycotted during Saddam? every one know that Saddams was the best guarantee to keep the pumps running the Iraqi oil to America..
Want to take over the control of the producing fields? Is that easier with Iraqis getting more involved with their country wealth and interests?
Protecting Israel? >>> Is there worse than liberating Arab people from the current Arab static system to the future of Israel expansion and aggressiveness? Haven't Saddam been the jewel in the Israeli aggressiveness crown, by all what he did toward weakening the region? Every one knows very well that all those stupid propaganda about Israeli presence in Iraq is a non-sense.
Dividing Iraq? >>>> Why will they do it? To let Iranians and Turks and Suadees having more control in ME ? Is not that breaking the geopolitical balance in the region, that balance that super powers are very sensitive to keep up?
To get military bases in ME? >>> Is there more than Americans having bases and permissions in ME? In Egypt/Turkey/Suadee/Qatar/Afghanistan/Israel/ and other center Asia countries.
They might be not sure about future of these bases? >>>> Is liberating Iraqis making it more secure?
Crusaders attack? >>>Weren’t the crusaders leaders "in the sense of missionary" against the liberation, I mean France and Vatican.
Then why?. Is it, as some Iraqis might believe in, Alchalabe had tricked them in getting in? Any one with simple background about American politics would laugh at this!
This is a questions that I want some answer about..

</SPAN>geovisit();